September 2008 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Sep 1 05:06:36 GMT 2008
Ending: Tue Sep 30 23:09:18 GMT 2008
Messages: 108

• [cifs-protocol] LSA and trusted domains   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] KVNO of trusts   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Meaning of ACB_PWNOTREQ / UF_PASSWD_NOTREQD   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Re: Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] What are the 'Service' levels in SamLogonEx?   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Backing store and policy application information for MS-APDS   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Re: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: What are the 'Service' levels in SamLogonEx?   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] ANR and anr==andrew   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2)   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Trusted domains and NETLOGON   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] CreateTrustedDomainEX blob incorrect   Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] What happened to SamLogon validation level 4?   Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] Meaning of ACB_PWNOTREQ / UF_PASSWD_NOTREQD   Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] correction to SMB SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO info level   Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts   John Dunning
• Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options   John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA LookupSids 3   John Dunning
• Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options   John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Trusted domains and NETLOGON   John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] RE: CreateTrustedDomainEX blob incorrect   John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] RE: What are the 'Service' levels in SamLogonEx?   Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] RE: ANR and anr==andrew   Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Request for fix to MS-PAC   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253   Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Volker Lendecke
• [cifs-protocol] Re: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Volker Lendecke
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Volker Lendecke
• [cifs-protocol] FW: SAMBA4 Test suite interoperability testing in preparation for the upcoming event.   Nick Meier
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] FW: SAMBA4 Test suite interoperability testing in preparation for the upcoming event.   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Backing store and policy application information for MS-APDS   Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] RE: What are the 'Service' levels in SamLogonEx?   Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] RE: ANR and anr==andrew   Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee   Ron Schnell
• [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO   Adam Simpkins
• [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags?   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Microsoft Client tool expectatations   Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] FW: SAMBA4 Test suite interoperability testing in preparation for the upcoming event.   Darryl Welch
• [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Meaning of ACB_PWNOTREQ / UF_PASSWD_NOTREQD   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO (SRX080803600053)   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Response: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Resend: Response: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information   Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] correction to SMB SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO info level   robert.hinchliff at quantel.com

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 23:09:18 GMT 2008
Archived on: Tue Sep 30 23:09:39 GMT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...