[cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:36 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >>    Does this  mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ?
> 
> >Correct.  However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue.
> 
> Could you explain a little bit more about this ?   If you put
> everything back to original condition, you can still see the problem
> with XP ADCU. 

For me, I now have success all the time.  Presumably the client cached
something, or is simply non-deterministic. 

>  After some changes made to schema, the problem doesn't occur any
> more.  Is my understanding right ?

I wish :-).  According to my reporter, he still gets failures, in old
versions and new.  I've CC'ed him so he can clarify the situation. 

> Should I still concentrate on the original condition under which we have a capture ?
> 
> Is it possible for you to send us a network trace for the current successful condition so we can compare ?

I think the trace is the same (as I get success regardless of new or old
code), but I'll see what I can do.

The bug tracking this (with a few distractions) is:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5713

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080923/ab4ceb6a/attachment.bin