[cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Sep 23 20:18:54 GMT 2008
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:36 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> >> Andrew,
> >> Does this mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ?
> >Correct. However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue.
> Could you explain a little bit more about this ? If you put
> everything back to original condition, you can still see the problem
> with XP ADCU.
For me, I now have success all the time. Presumably the client cached
something, or is simply non-deterministic.
> After some changes made to schema, the problem doesn't occur any
> more. Is my understanding right ?
I wish :-). According to my reporter, he still gets failures, in old
versions and new. I've CC'ed him so he can clarify the situation.
> Should I still concentrate on the original condition under which we have a capture ?
> Is it possible for you to send us a network trace for the current successful condition so we can compare ?
I think the trace is the same (as I get success regardless of new or old
code), but I'll see what I can do.
The bug tracking this (with a few distractions) is:
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080923/ab4ceb6a/attachment.bin
More information about the cifs-protocol