[cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Thu Sep 11 17:29:52 GMT 2008
This draft expired about ten years ago. The IETF is not really in the loop
and longer. It is currently part of Microsoft's documentation set
(referenced as [CIFS]), but will be replaced.
In fact, I'm the person rewriting the CIFS docs for Microsoft, and I have
noted Volker's bug report.
Thanks, Volker. :)
Sebastian Canevari wrote:
> Hi Volker,
> If you need to request a change in the draft, the best way to request a change would be at:
> Active IETF Working Groups
> If you find errors, please notify ietf-web at ietf.org.
> However, I did forward the request (after verifying it) to our product group so they can take it under consideration when writing the CIFS doc.
> Thanks for your help.
> Sebastian Canevari
> Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
> 7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039
> "Las Colinas - LC2"
> Tel: +1 469 775 7849
> e-mail: sebastc at microsoft.com
> We're hiring
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE]
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 3:01 PM
> To: Interoperability Documentation Help
> Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2
> A minor glitch I just found in
> draft-leach-cifs-v1-spec-02.txt: 3.13.1 says that
> WordCount=8 for the secondary trans requests. This is true for SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY. For SMB_COM_TRANSACTION2_SECONDARY WordCount is 9, as is obvious in the list of fields (it also contains the fid). Maybe something to fix.
> cifs-protocol mailing list
> cifs-protocol at cifs.org
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the cifs-protocol