Hey admins. It's not nice.
metze at samba.org
Mon May 22 17:38:15 UTC 2017
> Looks like you don't let my question about compiling talloc on Cygwin through.
> Fine. How about you edit the talloc web page and remove the mention of
> this list from there? Currently it says, if you have any questions
> about talloc, write to samba-technical. This is wasting my time and
> everybody's time.
> And you ought to say that talloc is not maintained anymore, because it
> looks like so. There are plenty of people on the internet trying to
> compile talloc on Cygwin and maybe on other platforms and failing.
> Maybe you should mention that talloc is abandoned so that the
> developers of future applications will not depend on it, knowing that
> they won't be able to get any support.
Your questions got through, see
But nobody replied yet, sorry.
I noticed your mail, but I was to busy with other stuff.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the samba-technical