Hey admins. It's not nice.

Tony Malykh anton.malykh at gmail.com
Mon May 22 17:47:48 UTC 2017


Oh, then I deeply apologize for this upset email.
I assumed I'd get a copy of this email from the mailing list address
when it gets through, but I guess this is not the case with this
mailing list.
Sorry about that.

On 5/22/17, Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
>> Looks like you don't let my question about compiling talloc on Cygwin
>> through.
>>
>> Fine. How about you edit the talloc web page and remove the mention of
>> this list from there? Currently it says, if you have any questions
>> about talloc, write to samba-technical. This is wasting my time and
>> everybody's time.
>>
>> And you ought to say that talloc is not maintained anymore, because it
>> looks like so. There are plenty of people on the internet trying to
>> compile talloc on Cygwin and maybe on other platforms and failing.
>> Maybe you should mention that talloc is abandoned so that the
>> developers of future applications will not depend on it, knowing that
>> they won't be able to get any support.
>
> Your questions got through, see
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2017-May/120706.html
>
> But nobody replied yet, sorry.
>
> I noticed your mail, but I was to busy with other stuff.
>
> metze
>
>
>



More information about the samba-technical mailing list