More on the Orinoco + XI-825 + StrongARM platform...

David Gibson hermes at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Fri Feb 22 16:51:00 EST 2002


On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:46:36PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> 
> 
> David Gibson wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:55:02AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> >
> >>Now that I got the NIC working with the compile option,
> >>I tried a ping -f
> >>
> >>Both the laptop (running the orinoco driver in 2.4.17-pre2)
> >>and the cube show similar errors.  However, it appears that
> >>most of the packets are being sent and received correctly,
> >>though there are definately some drops too.
> >>
> >>(I commented out the verbose printing in the cube driver, btw...)
> >>
> >>Here's from the cube:
> >>
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=0212)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=0264)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=02FD)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=018E)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=037B)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=01F4)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=025F)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=0314)
> >>eth1: Tx error, status 1 (FID=02E0)
> >>
> >
> >Looks like one of the all-too-numerous generic errors we're fighting
> >at the moment :-(
> 
> 
> Is there anywhere I can look to see what 'status 1' might mean?
> I got over my fear of hacking drivers (hopefully that is a good
> thing :))

Status 1 is a "retry error" which I believe means that the firmware
has retransmitted the packet as many times as it's going to, hasn't
gotten an acknowledgement, and so has given up.

> Also, would it make sense to re-transmit the packet (or do we
> even know which packet this relates to?)

Given that, no.

-- 
David Gibson			| For every complex problem there is a
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au	| solution which is simple, neat and
				| wrong.  -- H.L. Mencken
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson





More information about the wireless mailing list