[Samba] Good Bye SAMBA?!?!?
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Sep 27 21:16:17 UTC 2016
Am 27.09.2016 um 23:04 schrieb Rodrigo Cunha:
> Hello man, Samba is not Linix, samba is a project by free license.
> Linux is a S/O too free license and not service, the samba is a software
> with source code open, the windows AD code probabely content code like a
> samba before the AD code is not open and anyone developer or enginear
> cold be use the code and logic in the code.
> Linux = S/O
> Samba is not Linux, samba is Free...
and linux is not?
> But i have the philosophy, i use what works.
i see, hence your other statements :-)
don't get me wrong but i don't need any education what linux is (at
least not from someone who converts a plaintext mail to HTML and
responds without sensible quoting), i just referred to the OP and from
the management part it's not much difference if you have a shell on
Linux, some BSD or even a Apple machine (apple to some degree)
unix/linux is user friendly, it's just selective who it's friends are :-)
> 2016-09-27 17:37 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>>:
> Am 27.09.2016 um 21:02 schrieb Gilberto Nunes via samba:
> I am sad, today! I start to study how windows deal with CIFS, Active
> Directory and DFS, I just decide follow the other path!
> I will give a try to windows tools....
> The question is: why Linux doesn t have such tools to help and
> server deployments?!?
> Everything will be easier than go to linux console and try and
> try and try
> and nothing happen!
> when you don't like a console maybe linux is not your OS
> on windows a feel pure hate because there is no useable console
> So, for now on, I will use Windows tool in my servers...
> I know many of you guys, just love Linux... I also love Linux,
> but came on!
> We have a hard way to do thing works properly...
> In Windows everything is just forward straight ahead.....
> if "it magically works without any control" is good enough for you
> maybe windows is the right thing - when i look at a simple windows
> 10 installation that needs as much storage as most of our servers
> together for just have a edge-browser and nothing else - well, i
> could puke and i had enough of any windows installation around 10
> years ago
> yes it was a hard way, it took time, it took try out many things -
> but compared to a server which acts like a blackbox - fine if it's
> good enough for you - before i ever in my live setup a windows
> machine (and the same for apple) i just leave the IT as a whole,,,,
More information about the samba