[Samba] Samba Wiki change suggestion
Bob of Donelson Trophy
bob at donelsontrophy.net
Fri Aug 26 16:32:33 UTC 2016
On 2016-08-26 11:13, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
> Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I
>> have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original
>> page back to the unison way of doing things.
>> I will also discuss the unison page with Louis Van Belle, I believe he
>> is still using this method and may have some input on what, if anything,
>> that needs changing.
> If it's mostly doing the same thing, we should decite for one method and
> drop the other. If someone comes up in the future with a third sync
> tool, we have the same content with minor changes for a third tool.
> Duplicate content = duplicate work. And in case of such a low frequent
> page, I'm sure it's getting outdated soon again - and then on two or
> more places.
Go point Marc.
I know Osync works fine and when I get my second DC going I intend to
use the Osync. I am using it elsewhere to retain ACL attributes and
backup vital directories. It works and saves ACL when option is enabled.
I have always read that UNISON does NOT support or maintain ACL
But, I am very much a newbie when I get this "deep".
Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy
"Everyone deserves an award!!"
More information about the samba