[Samba] Is the samba-dc package on Centos 7 gimped?
jra at samba.org
Mon Oct 20 12:03:35 MDT 2014
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:48:48PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 20/10/14 18:36, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:39:03AM -0400, Sonic wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny
> >><rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>MIT Kerberos was, and remains, the reference Kerberos stack, so the
> >>>>reluctance to migrate from it is understandable.
> >>>So what,
> >>If "MIT Kerberos was, and remains, the reference Kerberos stack" why
> >>doesn't Samba just work with it? Why should any distro using it have
> >>to do anything special?
> >Originally there were some missing features/API calls that
> >were easier to add to Heimdal (and the Heimdal source got
> >imported into Samba to do just that, which we'd eventually
> >like to get rid of and just depend on upstream).
> >There is active work going on to make Samba4 work with an
> >MIT kdc out of the box, and as I said the ultimate goal
> >is to get Samba out of the kdc-source-code business :-).
> Totally valid goal Jeremy, but as I said, RHEL could have had a DC
> nearly 2 years ago and worked on getting MIT to work with samba4 as
It's not as easy as it sounds, plus Red Hat is doing
all the work to make MIT work, so I think they're
doing ok here :-).
More information about the samba