[Samba] Is the samba-dc package on Centos 7 gimped?
rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 20 11:48:48 MDT 2014
On 20/10/14 18:36, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:39:03AM -0400, Sonic wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny
>> <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> MIT Kerberos was, and remains, the reference Kerberos stack, so the
>>>> reluctance to migrate from it is understandable.
>>> So what,
>> If "MIT Kerberos was, and remains, the reference Kerberos stack" why
>> doesn't Samba just work with it? Why should any distro using it have
>> to do anything special?
> Originally there were some missing features/API calls that
> were easier to add to Heimdal (and the Heimdal source got
> imported into Samba to do just that, which we'd eventually
> like to get rid of and just depend on upstream).
> There is active work going on to make Samba4 work with an
> MIT kdc out of the box, and as I said the ultimate goal
> is to get Samba out of the kdc-source-code business :-).
Totally valid goal Jeremy, but as I said, RHEL could have had a DC
nearly 2 years ago and worked on getting MIT to work with samba4 as well.
This is just my opinion.
More information about the samba