[Samba] Re: Ubuntu samba slower than red hat??

[Gary Dale]

Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
>>> [2006/07/25 19:12:17, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1225)
>>>   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
>>> ====end clip
>>>
>>> Does that provide a clue?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes, but I don't know quite what it is saying. :)  It may be that it is
>> looking for some NetBIOS information but don't quote me on that. The
>> experts on this forum should be able to provide a better answer. Or you
>> can try googling the error line. That frequently turns up useful
>> information!
>>     
>
> Hopefully in a few hours I will have some time to google something further.
> Did find this so far:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-304678-highlight-.html
>
> I tried the smb ports = 139 in the smb.conf file, right after netbios
> name, but it did not make any noticeable change. Then again, I
> was testing from a linux machine, which is where most of the errors
> are coming from.
>
> In any case, I hope the experts here have some ideas about that
> error message.
>
>   
For the Linux machines, you can also just export the shares using NFS. 
It is a lot faster and easier.


>   
>>> When you say set the log level up higher, the only thing I see is 
>>> to log more to syslog instead of to the samba logs, if I am reading 
>>> it correctly. It is set to 0 right now. Is this what you mean? 
>>> What should I try setting it to?
>>>   
>>>       
>> 10 or 100 should get you lots of messages.
>>     
>
> OK, I set it at 20 and will watch the logs and report back. 
>
> I'll not be able to get to the other suggestions for a few days,
> but will keep you posted on these things.
>
> Thanks, Gary!
>
> :- Doug.
>
>