[Samba] Fedora packages or Enterprise packages of Samba on RHEL4?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Don Meyer wrote:

> Were it up to me, I'd post the RPMs for RHEL with 
> a prominent disclaimer on the support issue.   (But
> then I'd probably want to separate builds
> for RHEL3/RHEL4...)   Many people aren't aware of 
> the improved ability to build RHEL packages from
> the tarball, and they only see the complete
> lack of RHEL binary packages as non-support for RHEL.
> 
> And I think a CentOS "branch" symlinked to the RHEL branch, or
> vice-versa, would be a nice recognition of that program...

The reason I mentioned CentOS is that its easier for me to
keep updated.  And given that the distro claims binary
compatibility with the matching version of RHEL it should be
fine.  And that way I avoid the support issue with RHEL.






cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEto3IIR7qMdg1EfYRAihTAKCJ/w2tsNlkOCB6UpWFzq1V9JqL+QCgrg5c
PLnFP0DMULbMYeKAOHLvmDQ=
=VYin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----