[Samba] Re: [Possible BUG] Samba v3.0.20b and permissions POSIX/Samba

[Thomas Bork]

Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:

>>2) 'map read only = yes' should give you 3.0.14a behavior.
>>-> according to the docs wouldn't "map read only = Permissions 
>>or No" give the <3.0.20 behaviour?
> oh yeah.  I forgot that jeremy decided to make it an enumerated
> type rather than a boolean.

Documentation says (b, map read only = permissions):

If the connecting user doesn't have permissions to *read* the file, the 
*read* only attribute is reported as being set on the file.

Mmmh. This makes no sense to me. Is this meant?:

If the connecting user doesn't have permissions to *write* the file, the 
*read* only attribute is reported as being set on the file.


der tom