[Samba] Re: [Possible BUG] Samba v3.0.20b and permissions POSIX/Samba

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Bork wrote:
| Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
|
|>> 2) 'map read only = yes' should give you 3.0.14a behavior.
|>> -> according to the docs wouldn't "map read only = Permissions or No"
|>> give the <3.0.20 behaviour?
|> oh yeah.  I forgot that jeremy decided to make it an enumerated
|> type rather than a boolean.
|
| Documentation says (b, map read only = permissions):
|
| If the connecting user doesn't have permissions to *read* the file, the
| *read* only attribute is reported as being set on the file.
|
| Mmmh. This makes no sense to me. Is this meant?:
|
| If the connecting user doesn't have permissions to *write* the file, the
| *read* only attribute is reported as being set on the file.

Yup.  You're correct.  I'll update the man page now.  Thanks.






cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDXhtnIR7qMdg1EfYRAuPIAKCSthPhpC9n+892kRTxuU1VaZzNrQCcCjv7
yuHSUq3KC8GY+mT6sX4LH7E=
=HYhl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----