[Samba] Re: Strange Behavior with Read Only files 3.0.20b

Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org
Wed Nov 16 04:34:04 GMT 2005


On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:17:42PM -0500, AndyLiebman at aol.com wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to look at the list very carefully for the past few  
> weeks, so I apologize in advance if I'm asking a question that has recently 
> been  discussed. I seem to recall there has been some discussion about a similar  
> situation to the one I am in. 
> 
> My situation is that I am having an issue  with READ ONLY files -- and seeing 
> very different behavior with Samba 3.0.20b  versus 3.0.13. Here's a simple 
> example to show what's happening. 
> 
> I have  two users called Jim and Bill. They are both members of the Linux 
> group  "editors". We have a Linux share called "Shared Files", and in that share 
> are  three directories -- one called "bill", one called "jim" and one called 
> "common"  
> 
> We are using the "inherit permissions" feature of Samba in this Share.  And 
> we are focing all files created by bill and jim to be owned by the group  
> "editors"  with the SGID. 
> 
> The "bill" directory is owned by -u bill  -g editors, with permissions 
> rwxr-s---- 
> The "jim" directory is owned by -u  jim -g editors, with permissions 
> rwxr-s--- 
> The "common" directory is owned  by -u supervisor -g editors with permissions 
> rwxrws--- 
> 
> The way we have  set up this Samba share, Jim (working in Windows XP SP2) is 
> able to move a file  out of HIS "jim" directory and put it into the "common" 
> directory (where all  members of "editors" have write permission).
> 
> Under Samba 3.0.13, Bill can  then move the file out of the "common" 
> directory and put it in his own "bill"  directory" (where only HE has write 
> permission). 
> 
> However, under Samba  3.0.20b, Bill get's an error message saying Access 
> Denied, the file is Read  Only. 
> 
> My question is, is the behavior Iwe're seeing with 3.0.20b a BUG?  Is the 
> behavior from 3.0.13 a BUG. Which behavior will future Samba version be  expected 
> to follow from here after? 
>  
> Thanks in advance for your replies (especially the Samba.org folks). 

Can you send a debug level 10 log of this, also how is the client doing
this mode ? Via explorer ? I don't have access to a Windows XP box at
the moment (travelling). I'll be back home with access to my vmware
sessions on thursday.

Sounds like a bug but I'd like to reproduce it and check it's fixed
in 3.0.21 (might be the delete on close issue that got fixed...).

Jeremy.


More information about the samba mailing list