Samba Performance vs. X-Windows/Telnet
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at switchboard.net
Thu Oct 23 15:03:19 GMT 1997
On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Louis Mandelstam wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > each smbd process will need 600 to 800k, and it's not recommended to have
> > smbd processes swapping in and out.
> Luke, I mean Windows 95 applications swapping over the network, to the
> Samba server - not smbds being swapped out on the server.
uh, yuck. ok, i'll leave you to it, please?
> Hackmode big time, uh?
smbclient -> smbd. additions to do NT Domain logons in smbclient, to an
NT Domain controller in smbd. having the same effect as playing chess:
feel like i'm swimming in space.
<a href = "mailto:lkcl at switchboard.net" > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton </a>
<a href = "http://mailhost.cb1.com/~lkcl"> Lynx2.7-friendly Home Page </a>
<br><b> "Apply the Laws of Nature to your environment because your
environment applies the Laws of Nature to you" </b>
More information about the samba