Samba Performance vs. X-Windows/Telnet

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at
Thu Oct 23 15:03:19 GMT 1997

On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Louis Mandelstam wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > each smbd process will need 600 to 800k, and it's not recommended to have 
> > smbd processes swapping in and out.

> Luke, I mean Windows 95 applications swapping over the network, to the
> Samba server - not smbds being swapped out on the server.

uh, yuck.  ok, i'll leave you to it, please?
> Hackmode big time, uh?

smbclient -> smbd.  additions to do NT Domain logons in smbclient, to an
NT Domain controller in smbd.  having the same effect as playing chess: 
feel like i'm swimming in space.

<a href = "mailto:lkcl at"  > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton </a>
<a href = ""> Lynx2.7-friendly Home Page   </a>
<br><b>   "Apply the Laws of Nature to your environment because your
           environment applies the Laws of Nature to you"               </b>

More information about the samba mailing list