Samba Performance vs. X-Windows/Telnet
Louis Mandelstam
lma at sacc.org.za
Thu Oct 23 14:10:09 GMT 1997
On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> each smbd process will need 600 to 800k, and it's not recommended to have
> smbd processes swapping in and out.
>
> also, if nmbd swaps out, that will stuff things quite nicely: various
> NetBIOS requests and NetBIOS UDP packets won't get answered. if they do,
> they will be processed anything up to a few seconds late. and given that
> windows hosts repeat queries once per second four times, you'll be too
> late, giving the appearance of loss of service.
>
> uh... louis, if you can't understand this one as well (easily!) could you
> possibly re-explain? i'm in programming/debug mode at the moment... :-)
I can see that ;-)
Luke, I mean Windows 95 applications swapping over the network, to the
Samba server - not smbds being swapped out on the server.
Hackmode big time, uh?
---------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--
Louis Mandelstam Tel +27 83 229-0712 Symphony /|\ /|\
Linux systems integration http://sr.co.za Research { } { }
Johannesburg, South Africa mailto:louis at sr.co.za (Pty)Ltd {___} {___}
More information about the samba
mailing list