[PATCH] samba-tool group list

Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org
Wed Feb 21 21:52:58 UTC 2018

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:46:40 +1300
Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> wrote:

> On 22/02/18 10:28, Rowland Penny via samba-technical wrote:
> >> As to *why*: it isn't just about showing that the patch works now,
> >> it is about ensuring nobody makes a change in the future that
> >> stops it working.
> > 
> > I can understand that Samba needs tests, but does it needs so
> > many ?? It wasn't that long ago that autobuild seemed to be in
> > total failure. My personal opinion (for what it is worth) is that
> > the test setup at present is too complex, is written in too many
> > languages and fails all too readily.
> Fair enough. That is why I would prefer you to stick with the existing
> language test infrastructure and language for samba-tool. Having some
> of the group tests in the python harness and some in a shell script
> somewhere does not simplify the situation.

Tough, I am writing it in the language I am most at ease with and
which I feel all the samba-tool tests should be written in, sh.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list