Latest Time Machine Patch

[Kevin Anderson]

Hi everyone,

>
> The F_FULLFSYNC extension "ensures that all data is flushed to stable storage”, according to the Apple documentation.
> This means, to me, that it ought to be mutually exclusive with `strict sync = no`.
> While `strict sync = yes` is the default, currently nothing stops someone from manually setting `strict sync = no` and `fruit: time machine` simultaneously.
> I’d recommend adding a check to ensure that is the case, if we don’t want to force it.
>

I personally agree with a warning in case a user sets strict sync to
no. I have added the check and reattached the patch series. Can I have
a review for these?

(Reordering/breaking up the commits was the most "interesting" time I
have had with Git to date. I have verified that they match in terms of
authors, dates, and content but if I messed something up please let me
know)

Thanks,
Kevin Anderson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-vfs_fruit-Add-Time-Machine-support.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2525 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20170919/ef3b5cda/0001-vfs_fruit-Add-Time-Machine-support.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-docs-vfs_fruit-Add-Time-Machine-support.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2119 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20170919/ef3b5cda/0002-docs-vfs_fruit-Add-Time-Machine-support.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0003-s3-smbd-register-TimeMachine-shares-with-avahi.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3220 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20170919/ef3b5cda/0003-s3-smbd-register-TimeMachine-shares-with-avahi.bin>