[PATCH] g_lock_ping_pong

[Ralph Böhme]

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:45:57AM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 08:06:29AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:39:38PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba-technical wrote:
> > > > > nah, I'll try to swallow the big pill. :)
> > > > 
> > > > doesn't apply to master, can you check?
> > > 
> > > The attached patchset survived a private autobuild against master as
> > > of Friday around noon, and rebases properly on current master.
> > 
> > ok, took me a while to get through. Really really nice cleanup!
> > 
> > Everything reviewed-by-me, accept the missing lock-order checks already
> > mentioned over phone and a few commits that should be squashed to avoid
> > EFUNCTIONDEFINEDBUTNOTUSED, see: 
> 
> I'd propose a different approach: We should make the functions public
> with a header file in one commit, remove their use in a second commit
> and then remove the then-public functions in a third one. This ensures
> full autobuildability in every commit and also maintains a clean patch
> history.
> 
> Comments?

if you prefer, I don't really care. :)

Cheerio!
-slow