ctdb

[Ira Cooper]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Ira Cooper <ira at wakeful.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Richard Sharpe
> >> <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It is for this reason that I have started thinking about what is
> >>> required to work with things like etdc or zookeeper where recovery
> >>> times can be much lower.
> >>
> >>
> >> There is changes in master that should make this possible.
> >>
> >> git show 46684867b187469f7827a3e3cd213443d44034bf
> >>
> >> may prove useful.  I've actually been working on a tool for such
> >
> > If backporting to 4.4, it looks like at least
> > ctdb/server/ctdb_recover.c would need additional changes to pick up
> > ctdb-recovery: Recovery lock setting can now include helper command
>
> There are other interesting patches for ctdb in master but not in
> 4.4-test, more than I expected (303 changesets) but it looks hard to
> tease out what might be a dependency for recovery lock change.  See
> the attached list.
>

Given the amount of refactoring going on in master, I'm not planning on a
backport.  4.5 is soon enough.

-Ira