Steve French smfrench at gmail.com
Fri Jun 17 17:10:24 UTC 2016

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Ira Cooper <ira at wakeful.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Richard Sharpe
>> <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It is for this reason that I have started thinking about what is
>>> required to work with things like etdc or zookeeper where recovery
>>> times can be much lower.
>> There is changes in master that should make this possible.
>> git show 46684867b187469f7827a3e3cd213443d44034bf
>> may prove useful.  I've actually been working on a tool for such
> If backporting to 4.4, it looks like at least
> ctdb/server/ctdb_recover.c would need additional changes to pick up
> ctdb-recovery: Recovery lock setting can now include helper command

There are other interesting patches for ctdb in master but not in
4.4-test, more than I expected (303 changesets) but it looks hard to
tease out what might be a dependency for recovery lock change.  See
the attached list.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: one-line-form-303-ctdb-patches-not-in-4.4-but-in-master
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29185 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20160617/41d44160/one-line-form-303-ctdb-patches-not-in-4.obj>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list