Tautological comparison in gcc 6.1.1

[Martin Schwenke]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:33:05 +0200, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org>
wrote:

> On 2016-07-14 at 11:11 +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > On 2016-07-14 at 18:45 +1000, Amitay Isaacs wrote:  
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote:
> > >   
>  [...]  
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > This is definitely a better option.  You get the warnings, but does not
> > > stop you from using --picky-developer.  
> > 
> > Umm, embarrassing: As Annop CS pointed out to me,
> > I made a copy-and-paste error in my patch, to the
> > effect of adding -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations
> > again instead of -Wno-error=tautological-compare ...
> > 
> > Secondly, I thought I tested with gcc6 but I only
> > tested with gcc5.
> > 
> > Finally, Amitay seems to have trusted my word that
> > I tested with gcc6. ;-)
> > 
> > The updated corrected patchset should finally fix it. :-D  
> 
> BTW: now *really* tested with gcc 6.1(f24), 5.3.1(f23),
> 4.8.4(u144), and 4.4.3(u104).

Also tested on:

* gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609

  From Debian testing

* gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)

  From RHEL 6.6 (unpatched)

peace & happiness,
martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20160715/641c4f6b/attachment.sig>