Locating regressions for 4.3

[Andrew Bartlett]

Wed, 2015-07-22 at 00:15 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> 
> 
> > I have opened a new bug for regressions at 
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 but I would rather 
> > we
> > just tagged bugs as regressions in the importance. 
> > 
> > Regardless, we need to use searches, not blocker bugs, as the way 
> > to
> > deal with the actually blocking list, and we need to start from 
> > zero,
> > not the pushed-forward list.  For example, while there are many,
> > legitimate and important issues, I've not yet seen an AD DC bug in 
> > that
> > list that is an actual regression.
> 
> I'm not sure we need
> 
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11405
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406
> 
> anymore, we could use milestones...

Agreed, I would prefer we just used the severity of regression (and
perhaps critical) and the milestone of 4.3 to decide what a blocker is,
and then close all of the above.

We should also close https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11376 a
s it really serves the same purpose.  That should be able to be
determined by the component and perhaps a flag. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team         https://samba.org
Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT   
https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150722/0812897c/signature.sig>