Locating regressions for 4.3

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Am 22.07.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> Wed, 2015-07-22 at 00:15 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have opened a new bug for regressions at 
>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 but I would rather 
>>> we
>>> just tagged bugs as regressions in the importance. 
>>>
>>> Regardless, we need to use searches, not blocker bugs, as the way 
>>> to
>>> deal with the actually blocking list, and we need to start from 
>>> zero,
>>> not the pushed-forward list.  For example, while there are many,
>>> legitimate and important issues, I've not yet seen an AD DC bug in 
>>> that
>>> list that is an actual regression.
>>
>> I'm not sure we need
>>
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11405
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406
>>
>> anymore, we could use milestones...
> 
> Agreed, I would prefer we just used the severity of regression (and
> perhaps critical) and the milestone of 4.3 to decide what a blocker is,
> and then close all of the above.
> 
> We should also close https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11376 a
> s it really serves the same purpose.  That should be able to be
> determined by the component and perhaps a flag. 

But components and flags doesn't match what I'm looking for.

I want all bugs which are in any way relevant for an ad dc.

I could use private tags on the bugs and filter on them, if others
don't care...

metze


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150722/aa4969b6/signature.sig>