Locating regressions for 4.3

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Hi Andrew,

> I've started looking over the bug list for 4.3, and closing some that I
> know are now invalid (like kcc bugs before the rewrite, or in the
> internal winbind).
> 
> However, what also struck me was that none of the bugs I found so far
> are actual regressions.
> 
> Therefore, while I have filed a new bug for 4.4 blockers, and I was
> going to start filling it up, I'm thinking that will just be a waste of
> time. 
> 
> Instead, I propose we:
> Retitle https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 as 'reviewed
> bugs', or us the review flag on those bugs to mark it as having been
> vetted in some way.

I think we can move most of them to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11376 (A bug to track known
AD DC related bugs)

> I have opened a new bug for regressions at 
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 but I would rather we
> just tagged bugs as regressions in the importance. 
> 
> Regardless, we need to use searches, not blocker bugs, as the way to
> deal with the actually blocking list, and we need to start from zero,
> not the pushed-forward list.  For example, while there are many,
> legitimate and important issues, I've not yet seen an AD DC bug in that
> list that is an actual regression.

I'm not sure we need

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11405
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406

anymore, we could use milestones...

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150722/09315a07/signature.sig>