YouCompleteMe

[Andreas Schneider]

On Thursday 05 June 2014 18:50:57 you wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:12:35 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > > What do others think: Should we allow this kind of
> > > > convenience in the repo? Only in a special subdirectory?
> > > > Or not at all? I don't know.
> > > 
> > > In general, adding things like this don't seem particularly problematic.
> > > They're making life more convenient for some folks and don't get in the
> > > way.
> > > 
> > > That said, it is more harmful to have outdated files in the tree
> > > than to not have them at all. How will the manual list of include
> > > directories be kept up to date?
> > 
> > I would normally update it as I use it on a daily bases. It would be
> > easier if waf would be able to create a json compilation database.
> 
> What about when the next flavour of the month auto-complete plugin
> arrives, abandon and move on? .clang_complete is the perfect example of
> this.

I plan to remove .clang_complete. YCM is faster and simply superior to it.

> I realise you find these tools helpful, and only want to share your own
> efficiency improvements with others, but I really don't see why these
> files can't live outside the core Samba codebase.

Cause vim requires them to be in the source directory which means I need to 
copy them there each time. As I said with the json compilation database it 
would be much easier.


	-- andreas


-- 
Andreas Schneider                   GPG-ID: CC014E3D
Samba Team                             asn at samba.org
www.samba.org