Arggghhh. Missing 'Signed-off-by:' and 'Reviewed-by:' in revert I pushed...

[Michael Adam]

On 2014-07-15 at 08:42 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On 15/07/14 08:01, Michael Adam wrote:
> >On 2014-07-14 at 17:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >>
> >>Is it possible to add an autobuild
> >>filter to reject commits without
> >>the needed tags, so I *can't* screw
> >>up the tags again ?
> >
> >This is certainly technically possible,
> >and in general I think it is the right thing to do.
> >We need to carefully write and test a script to
> >do the checks.
> 
> Didn't we agree on the SambaXP team meeting to _not_ enforce this
> via technical measures?

Hmm,  I recall this from some past year's team meeting,
not this one. Ah, of course it can be that either my
brain is dissolving, or it is due to the fact that
the team meeting was started eralier than scheduled
without notice that I missed something... (scnr) ;-)

I was just expressing the feasibility and my unchanged
opinion that I think this is a good thing.
Apart from that, any decision can be revisited.

Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20140715/a0aaf4e7/attachment.pgp>