[PATCHSET] fix and improve shadow_copy2 [Re: vfs_shadow_copy2] configuration

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 01:11 +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 2013-10-05 at 09:27 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 21:21 +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > > For people who did not follow the previous discussions:
> > > 
> > > This patchset essentially fixes shadow_copy2 for the
> > > "classical" case, i.e. with "shadow:snapdirseverywhere = false".
> > >
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > But first to master... :-)
> > 
> > This looks really good.  I was a bit overwealmed with the number of
> > patches at first, but it's just the 'commit for every tiny thing' style,
> > and wasn't nearly as difficult when I got into it.
> > 
> > I've hacked on vfs_shadowcopy2 in the past, so I've reviewed it and it
> > is on it's way to autobuild.
> 
> It seems to have failed.
> Was that a a flakey test?
> I just started a private autobuild to verify.
> 
> Thanks - Michael

I got: autobuild failure for task rebase during rebase

fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer
Cleaning up ....

So I think it's just git.samba.org not being reliable, rather than
autobuild itself.

I'll resubmit.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org