[PATCH] Finally run bind9_dlz spnego test, fix drs delete behaviour

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jul 5 05:54:37 MDT 2013


On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 22:34 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:01 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> 
> > Thanks metze,
> > 
> > To assert with more certainty that deleted objects stay under the
> > 'Deleted Objects' container I've implemented the attached, and I'm
> > running a number of autobuilds with this to try and verify that. 
> > 
> > The branch I'm testing is fix-drs-testing-21
> > 
> > https://git.samba.org/abartlet/samba.git/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fix-drs-testing-21
> 
> I've now got successful 6 autobuilds with:
> https://git.samba.org/abartlet/samba.git/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fix-drs-testing-21
> 
> This includes code to try and ensure we always have an up to date schema
> before we do the work in getncchanges.  Sadly the 7th autobuild failed
> with the FSMO test error:
> 
> [1574/1582 in 1h40m55s] samba4.drs.fsmo.python(promoted_dc)
> Testing for schema role transfer from localdc.samba.example.com to
> PROMOTEDVDC.samba.example.com
> FSMO transfer of 'schema' role successful
> Testing for schema role transfer from PROMOTEDVDC.samba.example.com to
> localdc.samba.example.com
> ERROR: Failed to initiate transfer of 'schema' role: LDAP error 52
> LDAP_UNAVAILABLE -  <Failed FSMO transfer: WERR_DS_DRA_INTERNAL_ERROR>
> <>
> UNEXPECTED(failure):

This also (in the intermittent test failure detection mails) in master,
so I'm not convinced my branch is any less reliable, but I'm also sad it
doesn't fix it.  (caused by schema changes still pending before this
fsmo test). 

How would you like to proceed?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org




More information about the samba-technical mailing list