[PATCH 3/7] torture: Don't segfault in smb2.session on error.
idra at samba.org
Wed Jul 3 09:53:12 MDT 2013
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 08:51 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:58:59PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > In particular the one that was discussed here already I
> > would say that initializing the whole buffer would be
> > unnecessary and would hide potential bugs in the smbcli_read
> > call from valgrind. For many variables it makes sense to be
> > initializes, but by far not for all, so a catch-all law to
> > make everything initialized is going to far IMO. But that's
> > just my 2ct.
> Well I'm taking about initializing variables, not buffers.
> I agree that's usually overkill and can hide valgrind bugs.
Same for variables ...
More information about the samba-technical