Do any of the compilers we care about not support __func__ or __FUNCTION__?

[Richard Sharpe]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:17 AM, David Disseldorp <ddiss at suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:35:09 -0700
> Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am sick of seeing things like:
>>
>>                                 DEBUG(5,("read_fd_with_timeout: "
>>                                         "blocking read. EOF from client.\n"));
>>                                 return NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE;
>>
>> where the name of the calling function has been laboriously typed in
>> ... and there have been cases where code has been moved around and the
>> function name not corrected.
>
> I totally agree. It's redundant information with the __func__ prefix
> added by DEBUG, and is often incorrect.

Actually, David, thanks for explaining what I was really complaining about.

Yeah, since DEBUG puts the __func__prefix in the log, we don't need to
repeat the function name. It just clutters things up.


-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)