Do any of the compilers we care about not support __func__ or __FUNCTION__?

[David Disseldorp]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:35:09 -0700
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sick of seeing things like:
> 
>                                 DEBUG(5,("read_fd_with_timeout: "
>                                         "blocking read. EOF from client.\n"));
>                                 return NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE;
> 
> where the name of the calling function has been laboriously typed in
> ... and there have been cases where code has been moved around and the
> function name not corrected.

I totally agree. It's redundant information with the __func__ prefix
added by DEBUG, and is often incorrect.

Cheers, David