patch for subunithelper

Matthieu Patou mat at
Sat Nov 20 12:11:56 MST 2010

On 20/11/2010 21:25, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 13:15 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>> On 15/11/2010 02:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> Hi Matthieu,
>>> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:59 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>>> can you review this patch it's design to make to exit
>>>> with a non zero error code if we have only 1 testsuite who has failed
>>>> but without any failed test (happens if the initialization of the
>>>> testsuite has failed, ie. because a module is missing).
>>>> An example of subunit output that shows this combination is also
>>>> attached to the email.
>>> I think in this case we should just change the error code if there was a
>>> failed testsuite without failed tests, rather than making up nonexistant
>>> tests. Creating tests will cause havoc for test runners, since they will
>>> not be able to request this test be run manually.
>> Is this version of the patch better for you ?
>> I tried not to pollute the test output with fake/non existing errors.
> This seems to be the wrong patch.
Oups !
Try this one.

Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
Private repo;a=summary

More information about the samba-technical mailing list