patch for subunithelper

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 13:15 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 15/11/2010 02:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Matthieu,
> >
> > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:59 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> >> can you review this patch it's design to make filter-subunit.py to exit
> >> with a non zero error code if we have only 1 testsuite who has failed
> >> but without any failed test (happens if the initialization of the
> >> testsuite has failed, ie. because a module is missing).
> >>
> >> An example of subunit output that shows this combination is also
> >> attached to the email.
> > I think in this case we should just change the error code if there was a
> > failed testsuite without failed tests, rather than making up nonexistant
> > tests. Creating tests will cause havoc for test runners, since they will
> > not be able to request this test be run manually.
> >
> Is this version of the patch better for you ?
> I tried not to pollute the test output with fake/non existing errors.
This seems to be the wrong patch.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101120/4329ff73/attachment.pgp>