About Samba4 vs Win2008 differences

[Zahari Zahariev]

Thanks a lot Matthias,

That's what I thought but I wanted just to make sure. I will verify it
and will know it is thing from the past.


On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:38 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Hi Zahari,
> 
> you mean the "OU"->"ou", "CN"->"cn" stuff? This has already been fixed a 
> month ago 
> (http://gitweb.samba.org/samba.git/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee524d3182de85dff2febaad2481e37ad5a8be8f).
> 
> Matthias
> 
> Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Have you managed to get anything done from this diff? I am interested 
> > particularly in "CN" vs "cn" and "OU" vs "ou" etc. stuff.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Zahari Zahariev 
> > <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Thank you Mathias!
> >
> >     I believed before I have not seen these differences with the same
> >     configuration. I will try get results with Windows2008 (R2) for
> >     Schema and then we will see where is the hurdle.
> >
> >     -Zahari
> >
> >
> >     On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
> >     <mdw at samba.org <mailto:mdw at samba.org>> wrote:
> >
> >         Thank you Zahari for providing those outputs. I pushed a huge
> >         amount of directory content fixes and will also integrate a
> >         fix for the non-normalised RDN attribute names ("CN" instead
> >         of "cn", "OU" instead of "ou"...)
> >         Regarding the differences in the schema objects I can do
> >         nothing (as you know these are MS-provided files and I won't
> >         touch them). Could the differences lie in the fact that you
> >         have compared the Windows 2008 schema to the Windows 2008R2
> >         schema (s4)?
> >
> >         Matthias
> >
> >         Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> >
> >             (Resending with smaller attachment)
> >
> >             Hello Matthias,
> >
> >             I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files
> >             as LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
> >             provision) vs Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
> >
> >             I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there
> >             were 0 differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
> >             someone has upgraded the Schema at some point.
> >
> >             Tell me what do you think.
> >
> >             -Zahari
> >
> >             On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Zahari Zahariev
> >             <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>
> >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> >                Hello Matthias,
> >
> >                I understand your situation. Here are the three diff
> >             files as
> >                LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
> >             provision) vs
> >                Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
> >
> >                I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA
> >             there were 0
> >                differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
> >             someone has
> >                upgraded the Schema at some point.
> >
> >                Tell me what do you think.
> >
> >                -Zahari
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>