About Samba4 vs Win2008 differences

[Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer]

Hi Zahari,

you mean the "OU"->"ou", "CN"->"cn" stuff? This has already been fixed a 
month ago 
(http://gitweb.samba.org/samba.git/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee524d3182de85dff2febaad2481e37ad5a8be8f).

Matthias

Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Have you managed to get anything done from this diff? I am interested 
> particularly in "CN" vs "cn" and "OU" vs "ou" etc. stuff.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Zahari Zahariev 
> <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thank you Mathias!
>
>     I believed before I have not seen these differences with the same
>     configuration. I will try get results with Windows2008 (R2) for
>     Schema and then we will see where is the hurdle.
>
>     -Zahari
>
>
>     On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
>     <mdw at samba.org <mailto:mdw at samba.org>> wrote:
>
>         Thank you Zahari for providing those outputs. I pushed a huge
>         amount of directory content fixes and will also integrate a
>         fix for the non-normalised RDN attribute names ("CN" instead
>         of "cn", "OU" instead of "ou"...)
>         Regarding the differences in the schema objects I can do
>         nothing (as you know these are MS-provided files and I won't
>         touch them). Could the differences lie in the fact that you
>         have compared the Windows 2008 schema to the Windows 2008R2
>         schema (s4)?
>
>         Matthias
>
>         Zahari Zahariev wrote:
>
>             (Resending with smaller attachment)
>
>             Hello Matthias,
>
>             I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files
>             as LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
>             provision) vs Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
>
>             I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there
>             were 0 differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
>             someone has upgraded the Schema at some point.
>
>             Tell me what do you think.
>
>             -Zahari
>
>             On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Zahari Zahariev
>             <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
>             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>
>             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
>             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>                Hello Matthias,
>
>                I understand your situation. Here are the three diff
>             files as
>                LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
>             provision) vs
>                Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
>
>                I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA
>             there were 0
>                differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
>             someone has
>                upgraded the Schema at some point.
>
>                Tell me what do you think.
>
>                -Zahari
>
>
>
>
>