About Samba4 vs Win2008 differences

Zahari Zahariev zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
Tue Jun 22 01:23:51 MDT 2010


Hi Matthias,

Have you managed to get anything done from this diff? I am interested
particularly in "CN" vs "cn" and "OU" vs "ou" etc. stuff.

Thanks!

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Zahari Zahariev <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Thank you Mathias!
>
> I believed before I have not seen these differences with the same
> configuration. I will try get results with Windows2008 (R2) for Schema and
> then we will see where is the hurdle.
>
> -Zahari
>
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw at samba.org>wrote:
>
>> Thank you Zahari for providing those outputs. I pushed a huge amount of
>> directory content fixes and will also integrate a fix for the non-normalised
>> RDN attribute names ("CN" instead of "cn", "OU" instead of "ou"...)
>> Regarding the differences in the schema objects I can do nothing (as you
>> know these are MS-provided files and I won't touch them). Could the
>> differences lie in the fact that you have compared the Windows 2008 schema
>> to the Windows 2008R2 schema (s4)?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Zahari Zahariev wrote:
>>
>>> (Resending with smaller attachment)
>>>
>>> Hello Matthias,
>>>
>>> I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files as LDAPCMP
>>> shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default provision) vs Win2008
>>> functional level 2008 (not R2).
>>>
>>> I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there were 0
>>> differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe someone has upgraded the
>>> Schema at some point.
>>>
>>> Tell me what do you think.
>>>
>>> -Zahari
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Zahari Zahariev <
>>> zahari.zahariev at gmail.com <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hello Matthias,
>>>
>>>    I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files as
>>>    LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default provision) vs
>>>    Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
>>>
>>>    I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there were 0
>>>    differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe someone has
>>>    upgraded the Schema at some point.
>>>
>>>    Tell me what do you think.
>>>
>>>    -Zahari
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list