About Samba4 vs Win2008 differences

[Zahari Zahariev]

Hi Matthias,

Here you can see results from the source4/scripting/devel/ldapcmp comparison
tool that ran today build of Samba4 against Windows 2008 (not R2). There are
some interesting things in schema.diff concerning attributes
like: adminDisplayName, adminDescription, systemMayContain !

Differences in letter case for CN, OU etc. I am interested in are gone for
which I thank you!

P.S. Do you think that this diff is not correct and I should run Samba4
against Windows 2008 R2 ??

Thanks!

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Zahari Zahariev <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Thanks a lot Matthias,
>
> That's what I thought but I wanted just to make sure. I will verify it
> and will know it is thing from the past.
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:38 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> > Hi Zahari,
> >
> > you mean the "OU"->"ou", "CN"->"cn" stuff? This has already been fixed a
> > month ago
> > (
> http://gitweb.samba.org/samba.git/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee524d3182de85dff2febaad2481e37ad5a8be8f
> ).
> >
> > Matthias
> >
> > Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> > > Hi Matthias,
> > >
> > > Have you managed to get anything done from this diff? I am interested
> > > particularly in "CN" vs "cn" and "OU" vs "ou" etc. stuff.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Zahari Zahariev
> > > <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Thank you Mathias!
> > >
> > >     I believed before I have not seen these differences with the same
> > >     configuration. I will try get results with Windows2008 (R2) for
> > >     Schema and then we will see where is the hurdle.
> > >
> > >     -Zahari
> > >
> > >
> > >     On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
> > >     <mdw at samba.org <mailto:mdw at samba.org>> wrote:
> > >
> > >         Thank you Zahari for providing those outputs. I pushed a huge
> > >         amount of directory content fixes and will also integrate a
> > >         fix for the non-normalised RDN attribute names ("CN" instead
> > >         of "cn", "OU" instead of "ou"...)
> > >         Regarding the differences in the schema objects I can do
> > >         nothing (as you know these are MS-provided files and I won't
> > >         touch them). Could the differences lie in the fact that you
> > >         have compared the Windows 2008 schema to the Windows 2008R2
> > >         schema (s4)?
> > >
> > >         Matthias
> > >
> > >         Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> > >
> > >             (Resending with smaller attachment)
> > >
> > >             Hello Matthias,
> > >
> > >             I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files
> > >             as LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
> > >             provision) vs Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
> > >
> > >             I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there
> > >             were 0 differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
> > >             someone has upgraded the Schema at some point.
> > >
> > >             Tell me what do you think.
> > >
> > >             -Zahari
> > >
> > >             On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Zahari Zahariev
> > >             <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> > >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>
> > >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
> > >             <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > >                Hello Matthias,
> > >
> > >                I understand your situation. Here are the three diff
> > >             files as
> > >                LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default
> > >             provision) vs
> > >                Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
> > >
> > >                I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA
> > >             there were 0
> > >                differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe
> > >             someone has
> > >                upgraded the Schema at some point.
> > >
> > >                Tell me what do you think.
> > >
> > >                -Zahari
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ldapcmp_diff_files.tar.bz2
Type: application/x-bzip2
Size: 33170 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100623/d17b9e21/attachment.bin>