[RFC] Get rid of --enable-merged ?

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Apr 23 05:09:21 MDT 2010

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:02:02PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> It's fine by me.  I would prefer we don't end up needing to maintain two
> build systems for the source3/ code, so I hope that Samba3 adopts the
> waf build when Kai finishes it.  Either way I guess it's not much
> different to the existing 's3/s4/merged' challenge.  
> In the medium term I'm a little concerned that we may loose merged
> build, and not find someone with the time to re-add it, or loose it as a
> goal.  But I won't let these fears get in the way. 

If out of source4 waf builds merged by default and at least
some developers working in pure source3 stick with autoconf,
I think we will very quickly figure out build breaks.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100423/89fc3e8b/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list