proposal: merge waf build of s4 to master
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Apr 6 16:30:52 MDT 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:35 +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > This seems like a wonderful idea to me. That way we keep the
> > simple system for platforms without a default python, yet
> > we get all the benefits of a more modern build system.
> Doing the Makefile generator is indeed not difficult. In fact, Thomas
> has been following the discussion, and has done a proof of concept:
> The difficulty would be the configure generator. I think that could be
> a very difficult thing to write and to maintain. It is probably worth
> a try, but let's not assume it is feasible until we have a working
> prototype and we can see just how tricky it is.
Also, doesn't it mean we can't use any 'pure python' rules?
And given the earlier concern about debug-ability, don't we just make
the failure cases (which seem only ever happen on customer sites...)
harder to track down, as we debug a 5000 line generated makefile?
Is that really better for everyone than just shipping
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical