[RFC] Suggested "combined tree" for easier development
and Franky integration.
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Mon Sep 8 07:59:49 GMT 2008
Kai Blin schrieb:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 21:32:24 Volker Lendecke wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:07:22PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>>> We need to discuss how to handle the remaining
>>>> duplicates from the old Samba3 and Samba4 trees. I'm
>>>> looking forward to suggestions on how to improve the
>>>> migration guide as well.
>>> I like the concept, but let us (me) redo the
>>> git-filter-branch thing so that each new commit has a
>>> reference to the old sha1 in it.
>> Find the newly converted trees on
> And the newly generated merge tree at:
> If people are fine with this tree, I'd propose we switch development to this
There's more work to do before we can switch over...
1. we need to make v4-0-test and v3-devel readonly
update the sX-rename branches and to the merge again.
2. should be merged branch be named 'master'?
3. we need to update the build-farm scripts to
use source3 and source4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080908/47f92606/signature.bin
More information about the samba-technical