Question about the reason for svn r25261

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Tue Sep 25 04:13:01 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
> Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>> Hi Jerry,
> 
>>> I'm just curious as to why this change is necessary.
>>>   http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=25261
> 
>> It was like that before, but when we found new trusted 
>> domains from our dc we added them at the beginning.
> 
>> The WINBIND-STRUCT-LIST_TRUSTDOM torture test now checks 
>> if the first 2 domains are available and give a result
>> for the WINBIND_GETDCNAME call.
> 
>> And if we would add a new trusted domain to the beginning 
>> of the list, the tests can't do cross tests. The 3rd till
>> last domain can fail the WINBIND_GETDCNAME test and only gives
>> a warning unless --option="torture:strict mode=yes"
>> is passed to smbtorture.
> 
> Can we document this as an invariant then so it doesn't regress?

I hopefully have the winbind torture tests ready for make test in the
build-farm within this week. So the torture tests should be the
reference. Does this should ok?

metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG+IrNm70gjA5TCD8RAnvzAJ4n4uvxS+fKS4FgFUGvGGKJxdVj3QCfVrS9
egYfOwxYInvLueHz2Mv8A9s=
=b6Tf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba-technical mailing list