Question about the reason for svn r25261
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Tue Sep 25 04:00:28 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>> I'm just curious as to why this change is necessary.
> It was like that before, but when we found new trusted
> domains from our dc we added them at the beginning.
> The WINBIND-STRUCT-LIST_TRUSTDOM torture test now checks
> if the first 2 domains are available and give a result
> for the WINBIND_GETDCNAME call.
> And if we would add a new trusted domain to the beginning
> of the list, the tests can't do cross tests. The 3rd till
> last domain can fail the WINBIND_GETDCNAME test and only gives
> a warning unless --option="torture:strict mode=yes"
> is passed to smbtorture.
Can we document this as an invariant then so it doesn't regress?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical