Port winbindd child dispatch table split up to v3-2-test

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
> Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> 
>> No, we only have 1 IDL file, there's no relation between numbers of
>> child dispatch tables and idl interfaces.
> 
>> But not each child will response to each function, so the e.g. domain
>> child will directly return with an error or panic if it gets a
>> WINBINDD_DSGETDCNAME request, as that means the programmer gets
>> something wrong in the parent code, as this request should never reach a
>> domain child. And if a domain child would go into the
>> WINBINDD_DSGETDCNAME codepath, it's likely that it will crash or
>> something strange anyway, but this would be happen randomly and it's
>> hard to debug, so I think it's better to just give an "not implemented"
>> error or something like this.
> 
> 
> ok.  You've convinced me with the error response.

ok, I've pushed this:-)

metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHHFNrm70gjA5TCD8RAkc2AJ0WqJ6a/vBo9UYQQc6seTHyL9rjUwCfYiuE
rAnD9koLetGcxiytpC9fbOU=
=hL+T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----