Port winbindd child dispatch table split up to v3-2-test
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Sun Oct 21 16:55:37 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> No, we only have 1 IDL file, there's no relation between numbers of
> child dispatch tables and idl interfaces.
> But not each child will response to each function, so the e.g. domain
> child will directly return with an error or panic if it gets a
> WINBINDD_DSGETDCNAME request, as that means the programmer gets
> something wrong in the parent code, as this request should never reach a
> domain child. And if a domain child would go into the
> WINBINDD_DSGETDCNAME codepath, it's likely that it will crash or
> something strange anyway, but this would be happen randomly and it's
> hard to debug, so I think it's better to just give an "not implemented"
> error or something like this.
ok. You've convinced me with the error response.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical