first swipe at ctdb spec file

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher R. Hertel schrieb:
> ronnie sahlberg wrote:
>> There is currently no pCIFS   so I "took" the name. :-)
> 
> Hmmm...
> 
> It's a good name to take, but...
> - I think it'll cause some people to confuse the behavior of your pCIFS
>   with that of pNFS.
> - As I mentioned, Peter Bram did put out something (a proposal, at least)
>   using the name pCIFS.  People in the pNFS community are using the name
>   pCIFS when they talk about something that'd behave like pNFS.
> 
> As with the "Samba" name, my guess is that something better will come along.

I think it should be cCIFS "Clustered IFS"...

metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGY8G1m70gjA5TCD8RAmyZAKCCmeomfoqlYofLqxGYufp0PUaCJwCgo3Ht
G2AnKLOFEzoq4i6YiA44JBc=
=D5Xq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----