[Proposal] Punt support for security = share when using Windows
jelmer at samba.org
Tue Apr 10 02:00:35 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:33 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> Based on some research by Jeremy, it appears that Windows Vista
> It would be a waste of time to support this mode further. We all know we
> can get the same results with security = user and force user.
> Is there any use of security = share that is legitimate and can't be
> provided with security = user ?
Older clients that don't support "security = user". Not sure how much
there are still left out there though.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical