[Proposal] Punt support for security = share when using Windows VIsta

[Jelmer Vernooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:33 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> Based on some research by Jeremy, it appears that Windows Vista
> It would be a waste of time to support this mode further. We all know we
> can get the same results with security = user and force user.
> 
> Is there any use of security = share that is legitimate and can't be
> provided with security = user ?
Older clients that don't support "security = user". Not sure how much
there are still left out there though.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRhrvwAy0JeEGD2blAQLu+wQAivWZ/j1P6xzYcZE7i7duQcyumDgyYMMT
m45hzxgMcm4K3gRtq2WFy39YtAJ6J8tNfe5wrfo4Hx2/rOLGyaFeQAVpIgwvoY6B
eoboK9k1o5riQiruBE3Qxg9MFX18Ju+SYL69XwBs17ggStOVtqYA6u9igYhWqGhb
J7jbNHD4n2w=
=HhXE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----