[Proposal] Punt support for security = share when using Windows
jra at samba.org
Tue Apr 10 01:04:30 GMT 2007
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:00:35AM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> simo wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:33 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> >> Based on some research by Jeremy, it appears that Windows Vista
> > It would be a waste of time to support this mode further. We all know we
> > can get the same results with security = user and force user.
> > Is there any use of security = share that is legitimate and can't be
> > provided with security = user ?
> Older clients that don't support "security = user". Not sure how much
> there are still left out there though.
As even DOS clients support security=user I don't think this
is an issue.
More information about the samba-technical