plans for libndr ?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Sun Sep 3 12:46:36 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> No, I think the autogenerated code in the Samba3
> branch is the outdated one. Also, note that
> running pidl inside the Samba4 source directory
> is different from running it outside of it
> (different #include lines are generated).
But the structures should be the same I assume.
>> Finally, I'm assuming that the --samba3-XXX options to
>> pidl are not obselete, correct ?
> Yes. We should remove them once netdfs in SAMBA_3_0
> (which still uses them at the moment) is ported over
> to libndr.
>> There also seems to be some GetOptions() issues....
>> $ perl pidl/pidl --header librpc/idl/spoolss.idl
>> pidl: no input files
>> Do you want a patch for this ? or have you already
>> fixed in locally.
> You probably want to add -- after --header there. --header
> accepts an option output file argument, e.g.:
> $ perl pidl/pidl --header -- librpc/idl/spoolss.idl
> $ perl pidl/pidl --header=spoolss.h librpc/idl/spoolss.idl
I see what you mean. The command line usage is ambiguous.
The output file name is optional but you can't tell that
from "pidl --header file.idl" Whereas "piel --header
- --verbose file.idl" works fine.
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical